2022 CLC 404
2022 CLC 404It is well settled law that the application under Section 12(2), C.P.C., if alleges fraud and misrepresentation with particulars, needs framing of issues and recording of evidence. It
Call Us For Free Consultation
Our Opening Hours Mon. - Fri.
2022 CLC 404It is well settled law that the application under Section 12(2), C.P.C., if alleges fraud and misrepresentation with particulars, needs framing of issues and recording of evidence. It

2021 SCMR 1805Art. 133 —Material point of statement of a witness not cross-examined—Effect—Such point would be deemed to have been admitted by the other side

PLD 2022 Lahore 271In the statutes governing our country’s criminal administration of justice, the word “superdari” has not been used. However, it may be defined in its practical prospect as

PLJ 2022 Islamabad 200 Present: Aamer Farooq, J. MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ SHABEER–Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE and others–Respondents W.P. No. 3035 of 2022, decided on 22.8.2022. Constitution of Pakistan, 1973– —-Art.
PLJ 2022 Islamabad 102 Present: Saman Rafat Imtiaz, J. MUHAMMAD TANVEER AHMAD–Petitioner versus EX-OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE/ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-III, ISLAMABAD-EAST and 3 others–Respondents W.P. No. 440 of 2022, decided on
PLJ 2022 Islamabad 72 Present: Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, J. Ms. KINZA ANWAR Office Assistant HR, (NEPRA)–Petitioner versus OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN FOR PROTECTION AGAINST HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT THE WORK
Waqar and Waqar Law associates Best Law firm Lawyer in IslamabadLegal services in IslamabadBest lawyer in IslamabadBest Lawyer in RawalpindiBest Family Lawyer in IslamabadBest family Lawyer in RawalpindiBest lawyer for
2022 MLD 1378 Specific Relief Act ( I of 1877 ) — — S.12 – Suit for specific performance — Non – payment of balance sale consideration — Effect —
Waqar and Waqar Law associates Best Law firm Lawyer in IslamabadLegal services in IslamabadBest lawyer in IslamabadBest Lawyer in RawalpindiBest Family Lawyer in IslamabadBest family Lawyer in RawalpindiBest lawyer for
P L D 1995Supreme Court 34 Present: Mir Hazar Khan Khoso and MuhammadMunir Khan, JJ TARIQ BASHIRand 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners versus THESTATE‑‑‑Respondent CriminalPetition for Leave to Appeal No. 56‑K of 1994,
Suit for recovery of dowry articles — Framing of issues — Scope — Plea raised belatedly — Respondent ( wife ) filed a suit for recovery of dowry articles wherein
2022 YLR 2293Agreement to sell with regards to property of minor by mother without permission of court is void and cannot be enforced.